Received: from mail.webcom.com (mail.webcom.com [206.2.192.68]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id QAA21851 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Fri, 23 Feb 1996 16:25:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost by mail.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA020950852; Fri, 23 Feb 1996 13:27:33 -0800
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 13:27:32 -0800
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Message-Id: <33F60374707@CALUMET.YORKU.CA>
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: ZHUNT@Calumet.Yorku.Ca
To: lightwave@mail.webcom.com
Subject: Re: single selection
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
> YES!! You can use null objects as a work around if you plan ahead, but it
>is very inconvenient. If you decide later on to group objects that haven't
>been parented to a null object you are screwed. This IS a terrible
>limitation and only LW has it.
>
> >Gonzalo Garramuno
> >ggarramuno@sicoar1.sicoar.com
Good point, this was one of the first things I missed in LW right after